TrademarkDir
SUPREME COURT DEBATES
DEAD

Serial Number

76585616

Owner

The Congressional Digest Corporation

Attorney

B. Brett Heavner

First Use Date

Mar 27, 1998

Filing Date

Apr 8, 2004

Add to watchlist:

No watchlists yet
+ Create New Watchlist
View on USPTO

SUPREME COURT DEBATES Trademark

Serial Number: 76585616 • Registration: 3037201

SUPREME COURT DEBATES is a trademark filed by The Congressional Digest Corporation on April 8, 2004. The trademark is classified under Class 16 (Paper Goods). The application is currently no longer active.

Owner Contact Info

The Congressional Digest Corporation (5 trademarks)

PO Box 240
Boyds, MD 20841

Entity Type: 03

Trademark Details

Filing Date

April 8, 2004

Registration Date

January 3, 2006

First Use Anywhere

March 27, 1998

Published for Opposition

October 11, 2005

Cancellation Date

September 21, 2012

Goods & Services

Magazines featuring legal information, legal news, and legal commentary

Filing History

CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Sep 21, 2012 C8..
APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 18, 2009 CHAN
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2009 COAR
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 3, 2006 R.PR
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION
Oct 11, 2005 PUBO
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 21, 2005 NPUB
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2005 COAR
PAPER RECEIVED
May 12, 2005 MAIL
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 1, 2005 PREV
ASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 1, 2005 ALIE
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 18, 2005 CNSA
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 3, 2005 CNSL
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 30, 2004 CNSL
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 9, 2004 ACEC
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 2004 CRFA
PAPER RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2004 MAIL
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED
Nov 1, 2004 CNRT
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
Oct 30, 2004 CNRT
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 29, 2004 DOCK
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 26, 2004 NWAP

Related Trademarks

More from this Owner

SUPREME COURT DEBATES

SUPREME COURT DEBATES

SUPREME COURT DEBATES

SUPREME COURT DEBATES

SUPREME COURT DEBATES

SUPREME COURT DEBATES

PRO & CON ONLINE

PRO & CON ONLINE

PRO & CON ONLINE

PRO & CON ONLINE

PRO & CON ONLINE

PRO & CON ONLINE