TrademarkDir
ILLUMINATE VENTURES
LIVE

Serial Number

85174845

Owner

C.B. Padnos

Attorney

James C. Redmond

First Use Date

Aug 14, 2008

Filing Date

Nov 11, 2010

Add to watchlist:

No watchlists yet
+ Create New Watchlist
View on USPTO

ILLUMINATE VENTURES Trademark

Serial Number: 85174845 • Registration: 3985317

ILLUMINATE VENTURES is a trademark filed by C.B. Padnos on November 11, 2010. The trademark is classified under Class 36 (Insurance & Financial). The application is currently registered and active.

Owner Contact Info

C.B. Padnos (2 trademarks)

Oakland, CA 94611

Entity Type: 01

Trademark Details

Filing Date

November 11, 2010

Registration Date

June 28, 2011

First Use Anywhere

August 14, 2008

First Use in Commerce

August 14, 2008

Published for Opposition

April 12, 2011

Goods & Services

Venture capital financing; Venture capital fund management

Filing History

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2021 NA89
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)
Jul 6, 2021 RNL1
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED
Jul 6, 2021 89AG
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 6, 2021 APRE
TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2021 E89R
COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jun 28, 2020 REM2
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 7, 2016 NA85
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 7, 2016 C15A
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 7, 2016 APRE
TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2016 E815
COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 28, 2016 REM1
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2014 TCCA
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 28, 2011 R.PR
OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 12, 2011 NPUB
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION
Apr 12, 2011 PUBO
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 1, 2011 CNSA
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 22, 2011 DOCK
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 16, 2010 NWOS
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 15, 2010 NWAP

Related Trademarks

More from this Owner

GENDER SHOULD NEVER BE AN INVESTMENT CRITERION, BUT NOR SHOULD IT BE A BARRIER

GENDER SHOULD NEVER BE AN INVESTMENT CRITERION, BUT NOR SHOULD IT BE A BARRIER

GENDER SHOULD NEVER BE AN INVESTMENT CRITERION, BUT NOR SHOULD IT BE A BARRIER

GENDER SHOULD NEVER BE AN INVESTMENT CRITERION, BUT NOR SHOULD IT BE A BARRIER

GENDER SHOULD NEVER BE AN INVESTMENT CRITERION, BUT NOR SHOULD IT BE A BARRIER

GENDER SHOULD NEVER BE AN INVESTMENT CRITERION, BUT NOR SHOULD IT BE A BARRIER