EMAP Communications Limited – Trademark Portfolio

Entity Type: 03

EMAP Communications Limited holds 1 U.S. trademark filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), with a strong focus on Class 35 (Advertising & Business) — 1 filings in this category. The portfolio also extends into Class 9 (Computers & Electronics) across 4 Nice Classification classes. The owner is based in London.

40 Bernard Street

London WC1N 1LW , GB

1 Total Trademarks

Add to watchlist:

No watchlists yet
Loading...
By Date
By Name
Filter by Class:

Trademark Classifications

EMAP Communications Limited's trademark portfolio spans 4 Nice Classification classes, reflecting the scope of goods and services protected under their brand portfolio.

35
Advertising & Business (1 filing)

Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions

9
Computers & Electronics (1 filing)

Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical apparatus and instruments

41
Education & Entertainment (1 filing)

Education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities

16
Paper Goods (1 filing)

Paper and cardboard; printed matter; bookbinding material; photographs; stationery

Frequently Asked Questions

How many trademarks does EMAP Communications Limited have?

EMAP Communications Limited has 1 U.S. trademark filed with the USPTO.

What trademark classes does EMAP Communications Limited file in?

EMAP Communications Limited files trademarks across 4 Nice Classification classes. The most active classes are Class 35 (Advertising & Business), Class 9 (Computers & Electronics), Class 41 (Education & Entertainment), Class 16 (Paper Goods). Class 35 covers advertising; business management; business administration; office functions.

What is EMAP Communications Limited's trademark registration success rate?

EMAP Communications Limited has a 0% trademark registration rate, with 0 out of 1 resolved applications resulting in successful registration. Currently, 0 applications are pending review.