Trademark Attorney / Law Firm
Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. Henley and Andrea M. Sander – Trademark Portfolio
Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. Henley and Andrea M. Sander specializes in Class 9 (Computers & Electronics) trademark filings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), with 2 of 4 total filings concentrated in this category. The practice also covers Class 35 (Advertising & Business) along with 4 other Nice Classification classes. Currently, 0 trademarks are registered.
Showing of trademarks Trademarks
Practice Areas by Trademark Class
Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. Henley and Andrea M. Sander's trademark practice covers 4 Nice Classification classes, representing the range of industries and goods/services handled in their USPTO filings.
Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical apparatus and instruments
Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions
Scientific and technological services; industrial analysis and research services
Education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities
Frequently Asked Questions
How many trademark applications has Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. Henley and Andrea M. Sander filed?
Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. Henley and Andrea M. Sander has filed 4 trademark applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
What trademark classes does Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. Henley and Andrea M. Sander specialize in?
Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. Henley and Andrea M. Sander has filed trademarks across 4 Nice Classification classes. The most common practice areas include Class 9 (Computers & Electronics), Class 35 (Advertising & Business), Class 42 (Computer & Scientific), Class 41 (Education & Entertainment). Class 9 covers scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical apparatus and instruments.
What is Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. Henley and Andrea M. Sander's trademark registration success rate?
Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. Henley and Andrea M. Sander has a 0% trademark registration rate, with 0 out of 4 resolved applications resulting in successful registration. Currently, 0 applications are pending review.